From Madam C.J. Walker to Rihanna: Innovation Born from Exclusion

Innovation is not just about speed or technology. It is about who gets to imagine the future.

Today’s guest post is by John Bamforth, PhD, co-author of ‘Race to Innovation.’

Innovation is often described as a product of capital, technology, and bold ideas. In Race to Innovation, we argue that this story is incomplete. Innovation is also shaped by who is excluded from markets, whose needs are ignored, and how people respond when systems are not designed for them. When viewed through this lens, innovation is not just about invention. It is about agency. Few stories illustrate this more clearly than the arc from Madam C.J. Walker to Rihanna, two entrepreneurs separated by more than a century yet connected by the same innovation logic.

Madam C.J. Walker, born Sarah Breedlove in 1867, came of age in a society that denied Black women access to capital, education, and formal business networks. The beauty industry of her time did not consider Black women a viable market. Hair and scalp conditions were widespread, but largely ignored by manufacturers serving white consumers. This exclusion was not accidental. It was structural.

Walker’s response was not to wait for inclusion. She built her own system. She developed products specifically for Black women’s hair and health needs, but her true innovation extended beyond formulation. She created manufacturing capabilities, training programs, and a nationwide sales network. By recruiting and educating thousands of Black women as sales agents, she turned customers into entrepreneurs and built economic opportunity where none previously existed.

As Race to Innovation explains, this pattern is common when innovators face closed doors. When dominant institutions act as gatekeepers, innovation does not stop. It moves elsewhere. Walker’s company bypassed traditional distribution and marketing channels, proving that innovation often succeeds by redesigning systems, not just products.

More than one hundred years later, Rihanna entered a vastly different marketplace, yet encountered a familiar problem. By the mid-2010s, the global beauty industry was enormous, sophisticated, and data-driven. Brands spoke openly about diversity, yet the products themselves told another story. Foundation lines routinely offered a limited number of skin tones. Consumers of color were expected to compromise or accept invisibility.

Rihanna recognized that this was not a lack of demand, but a failure of imagination. When Fenty Beauty launched in 2017 with 40 foundation shades, it immediately reframed the market. Inclusion was not positioned as a niche offering or marketing campaign. It was built into the product from day one. This decision signaled a shift in strategy, not just aesthetics.

In the language of Race to Innovation, Rihanna leveraged what we call the blind spot advantage. Organizations embedded in dominant perspectives often fail to act on needs they do not personally experience. Rihanna’s proximity to exclusion gave her insight that market research alone had failed to convert into action. Her innovation lay in redefining who the “default” customer was supposed to be.

Like Walker, Rihanna’s success forced the industry to respond. Major beauty brands quickly expanded shade ranges after Fenty’s launch, publicly acknowledging gaps that had long been normalized. This pattern appears repeatedly in the book. Innovation driven by marginalized experiences often reshapes entire industries, even when incumbents resist until market pressure becomes unavoidable.

The leadership lessons from these stories are immediate and practical. First, exclusion is not noise in the system. It is signal. Leaders who pay attention to who is consistently underserved gain access to opportunities competitors overlook. Second, innovation accelerates when decision-making authority moves closer to lived experience. Both Walker and Rihanna retained control over how their products were designed, marketed, and distributed.

There is also a strategic lesson about scale. Neither woman waited for validation from established institutions before building. Walker created alternative pathways when none existed. Rihanna partnered with existing players, but on terms that preserved creative and strategic control. In both cases, innovation succeeded because it challenged assumptions embedded in existing systems.

For today’s leaders, the takeaway is clear. Innovation strategies that rely solely on legacy customer profiles, familiar power structures, or surface-level inclusion efforts will reproduce the same gaps. Inclusive innovation is not about adding diversity at the margins. It is about redesigning systems so that historically excluded perspectives shape decisions from the beginning.

From Madam C.J. Walker to Rihanna, this is not a story of isolated success. It is a recurring pattern. When people are locked out of markets, they do not simply wait to be let in. They build something better. As Race to Innovation makes clear, innovation is not just about speed or technology. It is about who gets to imagine the future, and who finally decides that waiting is no longer an option.

John Bamforth is the co-author of ‘Race to Innovation.’ He is an Entrepreneurial and Commercial Leader who has extensive experience in new business creation, innovation, and global campaigns, culminating in his most recent work as Director, Eshelman Institute for Innovation and previously as Chief Marketing Officer for Lilly’s Global Brands.

Did you enjoy this post? If so, I highly encourage you to take about 30 seconds to become a regular subscriber to this blog. It’s free, fun, practical, and only a few emails a week (I promise!). SIGN UP HERE to get the thoughtLEADERS blog conveniently delivered right to your inbox!