• Contact
  • My Account
  • Log In
  • 0Shopping Cart
thoughtLEADERS, LLC: Leadership Training for the Real World
  • About
  • Services
  • eLearning
  • Team
  • Blog
  • Clients
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu

Build your skills! Take our eLearning courses on TITAN!

World-class eLearning courses with videos, exercises, downloads, and a certificate of completion. Get started today!

Structured Thought: Problem Solving
Structured Thought and Communication
Strategic Business Planning
Principles of Chart Design eLearning Course
Engagement Management
Deliberate Decision Making
Breakthrough Innovation
Everything is Negotiable
Leading through Change
Storytelling for Leaders
Storytelling for Salespeople
Building Leadership Resilience
Compelling Executive Presence
Coaching for Impact
Building Personal Resilience
Building Personal Resilience
Wide Banner SPS
Wide Banner STC
Wide Banner SBP
Wide Banner PCD
Wide Banner ENM
Wide Banner DDM
Wide Banner BTI
Wide Banner EIN
Wide Banner LTC
Wide Banner SFL
Wide Banner SFS
Wide Banner BLR
Wide Banner CEP
Wide Banner CFI
Wide Banner BPR
Wide Banner TMM
previous arrow
next arrow

End of Year Reviews are a Terrible Idea

November 28, 2011/10 Comments/in Career, Communications, Leadership /by Mike Figliuolo

Performance AppraisalThere’s nothing like returning to work after post-Thanksgiving holiday food comas.  The best part is you get to prep for one of the most dysfunctional, time-wasting, intellectually insulting, and leadership-lazy exercises known to mankind: the end of year review.

They’re stupid.  Period.

And before you go all “I don’t need to read this – I’m a business leader and HR people are the ones who do performance management” you need to sit down, shut up, and read because if you have that mindset, you’re a huge part of the problem.

How failed is our leadership culture that we have to sit around and wait for HR or executive management to dictate when and in what form we must critique the people on our teams?

How messed up is it that we have to rely on compulsory forms with rating scales to tell people how they’re doing?

How sad is it that we have to hold cross-calibrations to stack rank people and force a performance distribution because our managers lack the ability to look outside their own organization and assess comparable levels of talent and performance?

We’re a management disaster, people!

I’ve written plenty on the dangers of bad feedback, the importance of self-appraisals, the requirement to fix bad performance before it becomes terrible performance, and how awful butt sandwiches taste.  Add this post to the list of rants about why our performance management systems are broken and what we as leaders need to do to fix them.

If someone works for us for 365 days, we owe them much more than a once-a-year sit-down to discuss their performance.  We owe our organization more than looking at all personnel once every four seasons.  If we truly want to get out of the rut of annual performance reviews being as palatable as beet and Brussels sprout casserole, we have to create a new culture around reviewing performance.  Here’s how we as leaders can do that:

1. WE own the process (not HR): Don’t blame HR for the performance review process being broken.  It’s our fault as leaders if it is.  HR is there to support the business.  If the process is broken, it’s because we allow it to be that way.  Take back the process and ensure it suits the business’ needs (improving our talent, keeping the best talent, moving weak talent to new roles).  We need to quit abdicating responsibility for the process.

2. Feedback happens DAILY: If we get lazy as leaders and rely on an annual process to tell us when to tell our folks how they’re doing, we shouldn’t be surprised if they’re disgruntled, confused, don’t trust us, and quit as soon as a better opportunity comes along.  We need to kick out the crutch of the process “telling us when to give feedback” and take our jobs as leaders seriously.  When something “feedback worthy” happens, have the conversation with your team member right then and there.  The annual review should be nothing more than a summary of all the conversations you’ve had over the course of the year.

3. Get out of the silo: Cross calibrations to ensure we have a distribution of talent across the performance spectrum is a control mechanism to keep those of us living in silos from doing stupid stuff.  We need those cross calibrations because we have no idea how good or bad the talent outside our immediate team is.  We need to get out of our offices and go meet people.  Speaking with other leaders in the organization about their team members builds relationships and helps us understand where our people fit in the broader scheme of things.  If we know that, we can more accurately and fairly rate their performance on a relative basis.

4. We don’t get paid to be liked: We avoid performance appraisals and feedback conversations because we have to tell people unpleasant things about their performance.  Instead of stepping up and delivering the tough messages, we hide behind “well I think you’re the bees knees but the folks in the calibration session rated you lower” or “HR’s performance appraisal process requires me to rate you this way even though I don’t think you’re really as terrible as they make it sound.”  We need to get over it.  Some people won’t like us.  We’re not paid to be liked as leaders.  We have to deliver tough messages.  If we own those messages and deliver them as soon as they’re relevant our teams will perform better and actually trust us more.  We need to understand we aren’t at work to be liked – we’re there to do a job and we get paid the big bucks to have the hard conversations.

5. Pay for performance: We need to quit being cowards and spreading bonuses like peanut butter.  Not all performance is even but we pay people like it is.  Oh sure… we pretend we’re differentiating pay for performance but giving your highest performer a 2% raise and your worst performer 1.5% is a freakin’ joke.  Why not give your high performer 3.5% and the low performer 0%?  Oh, they might not like us, eh?  See point 4 above.  And if you want a fuller perspective on paying for performance, you can read a lot more in detail on that subject in this post.

6. Quit complaining: We need to quit complaining about the problems with the year-end process and do our job as leaders and fix it.  If our performance culture sucks, it’s because we suck.  Culture is nothing more than the sum of all our actions.  If our actions are lame and cowardly, our performance review process will mimic that culture.

Are you going to let your performance review process be a disaster this year or are you going to step up and fix it?  Oh yes… I absolutely just threw down the gauntlet.  Are you up to the challenge?

– If you’re serious about improving your leadership skills, grab yourself a copy of One Piece of Paper: The Simple Approach to Powerful, Personal Leadership. There are plenty of suggestions in there for how you can lead your people more effectively. CLICK HERE to get your copy.

– Mike Figliuolo at thoughtLEADERS, LLC

https://www.thoughtleadersllc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/logo.png 0 0 Mike Figliuolo https://www.thoughtleadersllc.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/logo.png Mike Figliuolo2011-11-28 07:03:492018-06-26 13:55:42End of Year Reviews are a Terrible Idea
10 replies
  1. Hass
    Hass says:
    November 29, 2011 at 7:11 am

    Paying for performance ignores the fact that research has shown that most of an individual’s performance is an emergent property of the complex adaptive system they find themselves within and that only 10-15% depends upon the individual in question.

    Reply
    • Mike Figliuolo
      Mike Figliuolo says:
      November 29, 2011 at 7:18 am

      First, I’d love to see that research. Second, base salaries account for the 80% or so that you’re saying is common regardless of the individual so performance payment is on that marginal 10-20%. Pay for performance doesn’t ignore this fact – it’s how it deals with this fact. Also, I’m curious as to how that research defined “performance” because clearly that definition can skew any result (as can focus on a particular industry, job/role, level within the organization, function, etc.). Bottom line – people should be paid for performance and that payment should be sloped accordingly because the deleterious effects of causing a high performer to quit and move to another role where they’re more appropriately compensated (thereby leaving the organization with a less talented organization on average) can create/perpetuate a culture of mediocrity where a company is left with nothing but average or below average performers. That dynamic then makes it harder to hire high performers and a vicious cycle ensues. We can’t look at performance at a single point in time to assess a compensation strategy. The long-term goals and effects of the strategy must be considered and are arguably of greater importance than that single point in time evaluation. If you have the research and can share it I’d be really interested in reading it. Thanks!

      Reply
  2. Brian Ahearn
    Brian Ahearn says:
    November 29, 2011 at 8:46 am

    Mike,
    I don’t agree completely with you position on HR involvement. While each manager needs to own the process I’ve seen where HR involvement can help. My company went to a more structured review process and I’ve seen a couple of benefits:

    1. The guesswork is taken out of how performance is measured for the company and employee. It’s like grades in school – not perfect but you get a good sense that a kid getting As is doing better than the kid getting Cs. In our new system we all know what “Meets”, “Exceeds” and “Greatly Exceeds” mean.
    2. There is consistency for other managers looking to hire from within.

    I agree 100% with your assessment about waiting till year-end to review. All that does is highlight the last month of the year. It’s similar to judges in a boxing match being swayed by the last 30 seconds of the round.

    Not only does my boss sit with us quarterly, he asks each direct report to send him their top 3-5 accomplishments every week. It benefits him and it makes us focus on where we’re spending time and what our evolving priorities are.

    Brian

    Reply
  3. Tali Berzins
    Tali Berzins says:
    November 29, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    I had the pleasure of building an online HR review and merit system for a large Central Ohio company. Some insights:

    1.The average employee should be rated around a three on a scale of five, according to best practices.

    2.Threes will offend most people, so most manager’s rate to a 4.0 to 4.5 range, the good ones will anyway.

    3.The merit raise is absolutely tied into your rating. The higher the rating the higher the potential merit increase.

    4.Good managers understand how merit raise are doled out and want to take care of their own.

    5.The above information is super secret and no company wants to share this, but it is pretty much how it works most places.

    I guess this is more an insight then a comment to this blog, but it might help with the overall picture.

    Reply
  4. Matthew Ostrander
    Matthew Ostrander says:
    November 29, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    While the structured review system sounds great in theory, in practice it almost always fails miserably. Being an employee stuck in such a system, I have firsthand experience with its downfalls.

    Having a 1-4 or 1-5 scale for several metrics generally leads to everyone getting a 2 or 3, with 1s and 4s/5s being incredibly rare (how can you mark someone perfect? That would indicate they can’t improve. Do you see where this is going?) What if two managers interpret the scores differently? How do you account for someone going above and beyond in a way that doesn’t fit into one of the predetermined categories?

    Further, having the rating system allows managers to simply hand over scores without needing to explain why you received those scores. I agree that managers should sit down and talk to individual employees, but given a structured system there will be managers that use it to get out of talking to someone face to face (probably a failure of promoting that person to begin with…but few companies get this right all the time).

    Finally, a structured system will almost always correlate pay increases with score. How do you incorporate a 0% pay increase with scores? All 1s? 3 out of 5 1s? What happens to the pay increases at the top end? Going off of my first point, everyone ends up with almost identical raises, regardless of performance.

    It could be argued that all of these failures of a structured review system are human failures, and not failures of the system. However, until you take humans out of the process altogether, you’re stuck with those failures being the rule, and not the exception.

    Reply
  5. Victor Bettendorf
    Victor Bettendorf says:
    November 29, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    Hallelujah! Mike, where have you been all my life!

    As one of those dreaded HR pro’s my comments may be taken with a grain of salt, but I wholeheartedly agree. Most structured review systems were installed because a lack of leadership and have perpetuated mediocre leadership since there inception.

    The systems described by the other comments are not performance management systems. These are “compensation rationalization” systems or “litigation mitigation” systems, they do not contribute to building a performance culture, they are a barrier to success.

    Frankly, the vast majority of people managers are ill-equipped to lead so they default to a system or a process. Only the leaders who differentiate their strongest contributors from the pack and have the strength to extract the non-contributors are the ones that retain their talent and achieve extraordinary results, but this requires effort and risk-taking, it won’t come from an HR process.

    Interestingly, I have tried on a number of occasions in my HR life to “blow-up” these structured review systems and the greatest resistance comes from the weakest leaders, as they fear the loss of this comfortable crutch.

    I’m glad I came across this today, as I kick-off our review process next week. i will keep the faith and remember the Berlin Wall was destroyed brick-by-brick.

    Reply
    • Mike Figliuolo
      Mike Figliuolo says:
      December 2, 2011 at 3:23 pm

      Thanks Victor. You raise some great points. We need to keep trying to kick out the crutch of these systems and turn folks into leaders. I love your Berlin Wall analogy (although I’ll be the first to concede that I’m not even close to standing in Reagan’s shadow…). 🙂

      Reply
  6. Joy Bowen
    Joy Bowen says:
    November 30, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    Bravo….! As Ken Blanchard would say, “feedback is the breakfast of champions!” Without constant feedback (and many forms of it), your employees can suffer from de-commitment. The job becomes a task rather than something accomplished through purpose.

    Thank you for your hard-hitting candor. Great post! Annual reviews are a left over dinosaur from the Industrial Age. The ultimate intent was to improve performance, no? Today’s world involves far more creative work and far less widget making.

    Sadly, many people are hired into leadership positions who are not prepared to handle day to day situations or manage conflict. The annual evaluation only perpetuates a passive – aggressive approach to managing your problem employees and will likely encourage your high performers to pursue other options.

    “Drive” by Dan Pink is also a great read on better motivators than the “annual review” process. “Carrots and Sticks” don’t work anymore.

    Reply
    • Mike Figliuolo
      Mike Figliuolo says:
      December 2, 2011 at 3:22 pm

      Thanks for the kind words Joy. Absolutely agree with your points. All we can do is call these things out and hopefully give people the structures and tools to do it successfully. Thanks for being a reader!

      Reply
  7. Kirana
    Kirana says:
    December 15, 2011 at 8:20 am

    I’ve never been in a management position with the responsibility to review staff. But as the staff being reviewed I’d have to say that I agree with paying for performance. Firstly, nobody (or at least me) likes doing a better job and be paid the same or not much more than an underperforming colleague. Conversely, and perhaps oddly, neither do I like being given the same rating as a colleague I know is heads and shoulders beyond me. The latter is primarily because it is evidence that my management and employer has no idea what good performance looks like, and I don’t want to work for such people.

    That said, I’ve had a pretty good review session in my new job this year – I finally found the discussion useful and rewarding. It makes such a difference when the management owns the process.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Get free blog posts by email NOW!

It’s the best 5 minutes a week you can spend on your development.

Subscribe HERE!


All Contacts

Get new posts FREE via RSS!
Follow thoughtLEADERS on LinkedInFollow thoughtLEADERS on twitter
This site contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
 

Check Out Our Courses

Our courses teach immediately applicable skills that have real impact on your business. From leadership to strategy and negotiation to conflict resolution, we have a broad set of course offerings that will drive immediate performance improvements.
OUR COURSES

Our Courses

Group of Business People Meeting
Puzzle Pieces
Glasses Looking Over Cityscape
Doors on a Wall
Cog Wheels
Man Reading Book
Fishing hook in the sea
Microphone in Lecture Hall
Charts on Blue Background
Wristwatch
Exploding Light Bulb
Man on Summit of Mountain
Lightning Bolts
Man Painting the Word Change on a Wall
Construction Cranes
Plant Growing in a Hand
High Performance Gears
Men Shaking Hands Closeup
Influence Definition
Sailboat at Sunset
Hanging light bulbs with glowing one isolated on dark blue background
Wagon Wheel
Executive Communications
Structured Problem Solving
Creating Leadership Maxims
Leading inside the Box
Deliberate Decision Making
Simple Strategic Planning
Storytelling for Leaders
Storytelling for Sales
Executive Presence
Principles of Chart Design
Time Management Mastery
Breakthrough Innovation
Leadership Resilience
Conflict Resolution
Leading through Change
Project Management Reality
Coaching for Impact
High Performing Teams
Everything is Negotiable
Leading with Influence
Building Personal Resilience
thoughtLEADERSHIP
Engagement Management
previous arrow
next arrow
 

eLearning Courses on TITAN

Structured Thought: Problem Solving
Puzzle Pieces
Structured Thought: Problem Solving

Clearly define a problem, scope all issues related to the problem, generate potential solutions, then analyze and select the best solution by using time-tested critical thinking methods and tools.

VIEW COURSE
Structured Thought and Communication
Group of Business People Meeting
Structured Thought and Communication

Craft clear and compelling recommendations that resonate with stakeholders. Get your ideas approved by using a proven method for delivering executive-level communications.

VIEW COURSE
Principles of Chart Design
Different Types of Line and Bar Charts
Principles of Chart Design

Create well-designed presentation charts that get your message across quickly and clearly to drive your audience to action. From data charts to concept charts, these methods help make your point.

VIEW COURSE
Engagement Management
Wagon Wheel
Engagement Management

Whether you’re an internal or external consultant or a project leader, learn proven methods, techniques, and processes to effectively lead consulting engagements that drive your client’s success.

VIEW COURSE
Strategic Business Planning
Cog Wheels
Strategic Business Planning

Use a straightforward and effective strategic planning process that shows how to craft a clear, compelling plan for your organization - not just one time, but on an ongoing basis year after year.

VIEW COURSE
Deliberate Decision Making
Deliberate Decision Making
Deliberate Decision Making

Make better, faster, and more effective decisions. Apply simple yet powerful decision making tools to define decision authority, manage risk, increase accountability, and drive execution.

VIEW COURSE
Everything is Negotiable
Men Shaking Hands
Everything is Negotiable

Become a better negotiator in all situations – from day to day interactions to hammering out large deals. Build the skills required to get what you want and strengthen relationships while you do.

VIEW COURSE
Breakthrough Innovation
Exploding Lightbulb
Breakthrough Innovation

Generate and select unique strategies that separate you from the competition. Construct bold and disruptive solutions then build and execute a plan for taking those strategies to market.

VIEW COURSE
Storytelling for Leaders
Man reading stories from a book
Storytelling for Leaders

Create business stories that inspire people, build connections with your audience, and ultimately advance your organization's goals by using a repeatable, straightforward method.

VIEW COURSE
Storytelling for Salespeople
Storytelling for Salespeople
Storytelling for Salespeople

Create and deliver stories that will take your sales efforts to the next level. Connect with and convince buyers in all situations using memorable stories. These stronger relationships drive more sales.

VIEW COURSE
Leading through Change
Leading through Change
Leading through Change

Lead your organization through the most challenging times using a proven change management process. Get people through the change and back to driving performance quickly and effectively.

VIEW COURSE
Building Leadership Resilience
Mountain Climbing Expedition
Building Leadership Resilience

Prepare your body and brain to be ready for and recover from your biggest challenges. Build approaches for overcoming stress, managing reactions to difficult events, and leading more effectively.

VIEW COURSE
Compelling Executive Presence
Compelling Executive Presence
Compelling Executive Presence

Build your ability to connect with your audience and convey your ideas in a clear and resonant way. Create meaningful connections between you and your audience to build buy-in.

VIEW COURSE
Coaching for Impact
Plant Growing in a Hand
Coaching for Impact: Foundation Course

Coach employees for performance and development more effectively by helping them identify and pursue their own solutions. Create the right environment and conditions to help them grow.

VIEW COURSE
Building Personal Resilience
Boat at Sunset
Building Personal Resilience

Build the habits and learn the behaviors required to manage stress, deal with adversity, and maintain your physical and mental wellbeing. Personal resilience is a key to your ongoing success.

VIEW COURSE
Time Management Mastery
Watches
Time Management Mastery

Learn techniques to manage your time, delegate, say “no,” and be more efficient. Balance your limited supply of time with the overwhelming demands that are placed on you every day.

VIEW COURSE
previous arrow
next arrow

Books You MUST Read

The Elegant Pitch
One Piece of Paper by Mike Figliuolo
Lead Inside the Box
10 Stories Great Leaders Tell
Getting Ahead
Sell with a Story
Lead with a Story
Mastering Communication at Work
The Hook
Innovative Leadership Fieldbook
Innovative Leaders Guide to Transforming Organizations
The Three Commitments of Leadership
The Littlest Green Beret
Storytelling in the Land of Oz
The Camino Way
The Power of Surge
Red Shoes Living book
The Inner Matrix book
The Elegant Pitch
One Piece of Paper by Mike Figliuolo
Lead Inside the Box
10 Stories Great Leaders Tell
Getting Ahead
Sell with a Story - Border
Lead with a Story
Leading from Your Best Self
Mastering Communication at Work
The Hook
Innovative Leadership Fieldbook
Innovative Leaders Guide to Transforming Organizations
20120318 Three Commitments
Leadership Vertigo
The Littlest Green Beret
Storytelling in the Land of Oz
The Camino Way
Hijacked by Your Brain
Outthink the Competition
Driving Innovation from Within
The Power of Surge
Red Shoes Living
The Inner Matrix
previous arrow
next arrow
  • The Elegant Pitch
  • The Vision Code
  • The Power of Surge
  • Red Shoes Living
  • The Inner Matrix

This site contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.

Categories

Our Course Offerings

Leadership Skills

Creating Your Leadership Maxims
Leading Inside the Box
Leading With Influence
Leading Through Change
Structured Problem Solving
Deliberate Decision Making
High Performing Teams
Simplified Strategic Planning
Strategic Business Planning
Coaching for Impact: Foundations
Coaching for Impact: Applications
Building Leadership Resilience
Engagement Management
Project Management Reality

Communication Skills

Communications: Foundations
Communications: Applications
Principles of Chart Design
Storytelling for Leaders
Storytelling for Salespeople
Compelling Executive Presence
Advanced Facilitation Skills

Individual Skills

Conflict Resolution
Everything is Negotiable
thoughtLEADERSHIP: Innovation
Building Personal Resilience
Time Management Mastery

Coaching & Consulting

©2022 thoughtLEADERS, LLC: Leadership Training for the Real World. thoughtLEADERS, LLC is a registered trademark of thoughtLEADERS, LLC.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Policy
You Need to Hire a Social Media Expert. Now. Leadership’s Role in Process Improvement
Scroll to top