How to Fix a Hiring Mistake
Have you ever made a hiring mistake? The candidate looked brilliant on paper. They blew everyone away in the interviews. They were local so there as no relo cost involved. They even took your first salary offer without negotiating (danger Will Robinson!).
And then they showed up for work… And all went well for the first month. Everyone loved him. He was gregarious and got to know everyone in the organization. And one day you woke up and realized he hadn’t done anything yet. Not one iota of impact. And you started to wonder…
Time went on. Less and less got done. Others in the organization began to notice and even grumble that the rock star you hired was not a real rock star but was actually a used up member of Poison from the ’80s (appropriate because this guy seems to be looking for “Nothin’ but a good time!”). It became abundantly clear to everyone you had made a hiring mistake. It’s okay. It happens to all of us.
The most important thing about making a hiring mistake is fixing it. Fast.
There’s nothing wrong with making hiring mistakes. It’s forgivable. What’s unforgivable is not doing something about it (remember You see it, you own it?). The best leaders I’ve seen quickly try to address performance (or lack thereof) with the individual. They set near term, measurable improvement goals. And if, unfortunately, the individual fails to meet them, they are moved on to another opportunity (either inside the company or outside of it).
But doing this takes a degree of intestinal fortitude that is difficult for many of us to summon. Such actions require us to first admit we made a mistake (admission is the first step to remission…).
After we come to terms with the fact we were duped during the interview process (albeit unintentionally duped) we have to do the really hard part – tell someone they’re not cutting it. Ultimately we might have to have that very difficult conversation about parting ways (which will likely be involuntary). It’s the “it’s not me, it’s you” conversation and that one is never pleasant to have.
So what’s a leader to do? How can you get past these barriers to taking action?
First, realize we all make mistakes and the interview process creates a situation where they can occur frequently. Why? There’s no real work to do during the interview and everyone is on their best behavior. Accept that someone got through the process without some of these issues surfacing.
Second, understand the person is a good person with a certain set of skills – they are simply not the right skills for this role. The error is one of not appropriately assessing fit for the role (it’s not a judgment of the person himself). Once you accept these two points, taking action becomes easier.
During the “corrective action” phase, understand you are giving the person a fair chance to succeed (presuming you give candid feedback, set measurable goals with a reasonable chance of success, and give the person the support and coaching they need during this phase). After you do that, you’ve met your obligation. The accountability for performance and success lies with the individual at this point.
So it doesn’t work out. Now what? Act and act fast.
There’s almost nothing worse than passing a problem on to another manager and not cleaning up your own mess. You have an obligation to the rest of your team and the rest of the organization to do so. Not acting will erode morale because your team and coworkers will see the inequity and wonder why they are held to a high standard of performance while this individual is not. Such an environment is toxic. It destroys the organization over time.
As I said earlier, we all make this mistake at one time or another. I’ve personally made it on a few occasions (probably because I have a bias toward taking risks on people – see “Team Building: Buying Damaged Goods“). In one particular case, he looked great on paper and even better in person. Brilliant. Analytical. Everything we were looking for. I loved him and pushed hard to hire him.
We got him in the role and at first everything was fine. Unfortunately, when the problems were difficult to solve and the environment was ambiguous, he floundered. Badly. His manager and I brought the issue to his attention and laid out an improvement plan. He didn’t improve.
He was becoming increasingly frustrated and unhappy with the role because he learned it wasn’t exactly what he wanted to do long term. In the end, we suggested we part ways and he move on to an organization better suited to his skills and aspirations. It was actually a huge relief for him to move on (for all of us, him included). He found a role much more in line with his abilities and last I heard he’s doing quite well.
At first blush, pushing someone out of an organization for lack of performance seems cold and harsh. Looking at it another way makes it a wonderful thing to do. You’re not happy with the individual’s performance. The team isn’t happy with the individual not pulling their weight. The individual likely isn’t happy because they want to succeed in whatever it is they’re doing.
Your obligation as a leader is to help the person move on. Quickly. Help them move on to somewhere they can be successful. Everyone involved will thank you for it (maybe not on the day you give the person their papers but someday down the road once they’ve found their perfect job, they’ll reflect back on their departure as a turning point in their career).
You made the hiring mistake. Admit it. Fix it. For everyone’s sake.
– Mike Figliuolo at thoughtLEADERS, LLC
– Get the latest updates on my upcoming book One Piece of Paper – CLICK HERE
WOW! How timely just made one of the toughest decisions I've had in business this week and feel a sense of relief. I totally believe in candid feedback as an owner I pride myself on giving it however I have a GM that just will not deal with the tough issues. I am beginning to think I may have made a hiring mistake on his end. Your posts apply to so many of his issues. Thanks for the insightful info. I can't wait for you BOOK 🙂 It will be required reading of my management staff.
@Denise – glad you took care of things on your end and that you found this post helpful. Drop me your contact info at info@thoughtleadersllc.com and I'll get you more info about the book.
wow!
"wow!" what? @Anonymous?
So, this is interesting. What about the iverse, you make the hiring decision and then realize that you haven't hired the wrong person, but have the wrong job for a competent person. And you don't address it for months….and then suddendly you go from starting a review to a "restructuring" and deciding to hire a lower level person.
how does that play in the orgaization?
@Anonymous – interesting dilemma. I'd suggest first seeing if you have a different role in the organization that is a better fit for this "competent" person. Failing that, as you do the "restructuring" is there a way to take additional responsibilities from other areas of the company and give them to this person and actually change the role so it's right for them? Or perhaps remove a poorly performing person in another area and shift those responsibilities to this person since they're competent (again redefining the role to fit the skills). If you can't do any of these, one of two things will happen. Either you'll do the "restructuring" and lose a solid performer which will make management look semi-incompetent and breed morale issues on the team or the competent person will get frustrated and quit eventually which also causes issues. The bottom line is make sure you're really thoughtful about the role BEFORE you interview anyone.
Good point – I've developed an interview format that really shows me if someone can do the work (I've interviewed people ranging from no experience of any kind up to 10 years work experience and their true ability doesn't correlate to experience at all). But it doesn't show me if they will do the work each month. I'm looking at other things I can do to see this; one thing I like is their ability to follow up and ask questions during the hiring process. What do you think are the smallest ways you could test the critical behaviours?
I don't think it's going too far to really test people as long as it's not deceiving them – one executive coach I met last year said that at the end of an interview he would tell people "now give me 3 reasons that will convince me I really shouldn't hire you, because I only work with people who tell me both sides of the story". It might sound a bit gimmicky but I think it's absolutely worthwhile (just not a fit for what I do). In fact I might start to "forget" to send half my responses when I'm talking to someone new since follow-through is critical for me 🙂